S
 
California Fertility Clinic

         
   
 

Chromosome Abnormalities in Embryos Derived from Microsurgical Epididymal Sperm Aspiration (MESA) and Testicular Sperm Extraction (TESE)

Authors: S.P. Weng, , T.C. Jackson Wu, S. Park Kang, M.W. Surrey, H.C. Danzer and D.L. Hill, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, ART Reproductive Center, Beverly Hills, CA

Background and Significance: Sperm from patients with extremely severe male factor infertility have higher frequencies of aneuploidy than that observed in the normal population. Therefore, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) may be helpful in screening for chromosomal abnormalities prior to embryo transfer.

Objective: To evaluate the patterns of chromosome abnormalities in embryos derived from ICSI in MESA and TESE patients.

Materials and Methods: Patients with severe male factors requiring ICSI who also had PGD performed were enrolled. The sources of sperm included MESA, TESE, and ejaculation (EJAC). PGD was performed by FISH with probes for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. Additional chromosome 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, and 22 were examined if indicated. Chromosome abnormalities were categorized into polyploidy, haploidy, aneuploidy, and complex abnormal, which involved multiple chromosomes. Statistical analyses were performed using χ2 and Kruskalls–Wallis tests.

Results:

1. There was no difference in the rates of fertilization, percentages of euploid embryos, or pregnancy among three groups, although maternal age was more advanced in EJAC group (38.5 ± 4.3) as compared to MESA and TESE groups (33.8 ± 4.4 and 36.5 ± 4.0, respectively; p=.004; Table 1).

2. Less than half of the embryos analyzed by PGD were normal in all three groups (41 ± 31%, 37 ± 38%, and 48 ± 31%, in MESA, TESA, and EJAC, respectively; Table 1)

3. There was no statistical difference in the rates of aneuploid, polyploid, haploid or euploid.

4. Complex Abnormalities were more common in the group of MESA than EJAC (48.3% versus 26.5%, p=.0005; Table 2).

Conclusion: Despite the fact that MESA and TESE procedures are reserved for the most severe forms of male factor, rates of fertilization, embryo cleavage, pregnancy, and euploidy are similar to EJAC-derived embryos. The rate of aneuploidy in embryos derived from MESA and TESE is not higher than that found in EJAC-derived embryos. There is increased incidence of complex abnormal chromosomes in embryos derived from MESA. We therefore conclude that MESA and TESE followed by ICSI and PGD appears to be a plausible approach with results comparable to using ejaculated sperm.

Table 1.

Demographic data of 3 studied groups

Group MESA TESE EJAC P-value
Case number 11 11 101
Maternal age 33.8 ± 4.4 36.5 ± 4.0 38.5 ± 4.3 .004
n, Retrieved eggs 10.6 ± 6.3 12.0 ± 8.4 9.4 ± 5.7 .64
n, Mature eggs 8.6 ± 5.3 8.5 ± 5.6 7.4 ± 4.2 .68
%, Fertilization 75 ± 20 71 ± 27 73 ± 26 .62
n, Embryos for PGD 58 54 460
%, Embryo cleavage 87 ± 30 83 ± 24 87 ± 20 .77
%, None biopsy 13 ± 30 23 ± 31 9 ± 15 .20
%, normal chromosome 41 ± 31 37 ± 38 48 ± 31 .37
%, pregnancy 36 (4/11) 18 (2/11) 20 (20/101) .35


Table 2.

Chromosome abnormalities in MESA, TESE, and EJAC embryos

Group MESA (%) TESE (%) EJAC (%)
Normal 21 (36.2) 24 (44.4) 225 (48.9)
Polyploid 1 (1.7) 3 (5.6) 27 (5.9)
Haploid 1 (1.7) 1 (1.9) 6 (1.3)
Aneuploid 7 (12.1) 6 (11.1) 80 (17.4)
Complex abnormal 28 (48.3)a 20 (37.0) 122 (26.5)a
Total embryos 58 54 460

a p=.0005



Fertility and Sterility
Volume 87, Issue 4, Supplement 2, April 2007, Pages S19-S20

 

   
   
Phone 310-246-4621
 
   
 
 

450 North Roxbury Drive, Suite 520, Beverly Hills, CA 90210

Site by WebInnovations.org