|
|
PGD for Gender Selection What you need to know before considering PGD for gender determination: One, PGD is a complex procedure: It requires expertise in embryology (making good embryos with high potential to implant), biopsing the embryos to extract one single cell to analyze it genetically, handling of embryos (some doctors are better at handling them than others), and genetics (since only one cell is analyzed, the genetics laboratory has to be highly experienced and have a low frequency of errors). As a patient you should get as much information as possible regarding the error rate of the PGD laboratory the IVF center is using. It should be preferably published in a recent publication, and it should be below 10%, and preferably below 5%. The embryologist doing the procedure should have done it many times and the same goes for the doctor doing the embryo transfer. Two, biopsy has some negative effect on pregnancy rates: A very well done study by Goessdens et al. (2008, Human Reproduction, in press) shows that biopsing two cells results in lower chance of achieving a pregnancy than biopsing one cell. From that one can deduct that biopsying zero cells is probably better than biopsing one. If you have decided to undergo PGD for gender selection you are accepting a small decrease in your chances of conceiving. Three, the biopsy effect can be compensated by the genetic screening of 9 or more chromosomes: In women 35 and older, 50-80% of the embryos are chromosomally abnormal (Munne et al. 2007, Reproductive Biomed Online 14:628-634). The method used by most IVF to select the best embryos for transfer is embryo morphology and/or blastocyst culture, but that may improve the odds of transferring a normal embryo only to 60%, the other 40% being abnormal. Although some studies have shown that PGS (PGD analyzing at least 9 chromosomes, instead as 2-5 for gender selection) does not compensate for the damage of the biopsy, in experienced hands PGD testing for 9 or more chromosomes does seem to improve the odds of conception. Why? Because abnormal embryos (40-80% of all embryos) either do not implant or miscarry. Why go through this expensive, stressful, and frustrating procedure to end up losing your valuable pregnancy? Without PGS, women 35-40 years will lose 18-26% of their IVF pregnancies, and women 41-42 years will lose 40% of them. After PGS the loss is significantly reduced, to 14% in women 35-40 and 22% in women 41-42 years old (Munne et al. 2006, Reproductive biomedicine online 12:234-253). In addition, if the biopsy is done well, and the PGD lab has a low error rate in the genetic test, PGD can improve implantation rates by selecting normal embryos with higher odds to implant (Munne et al. 1999, 2003, Gianaroli et al. 1999, Colls et al. 2007 Fertility and Sterility 88:53-61). However, while the 9-chromosome test can detect 61% of aneuploidías (abnormalities), the 12 can detect about 70% and array CGH can detect 100% of aneuploidías, the 5 test can only detect 14%!!!, and a X and Y test less than 10%. Four, if you decided to go for gender selection it pays to do PGS
for 9 to 12 chromosomes or array CGH:
In conclusion, for 500-700$ difference that cost a 9 probe test
compared with a 3 or 5 chromosome test (and provided the test is
performing the test in the right IVF lab and the right PGD lab), by
analyzing 9 or more chromosomes you get an increased chance to carrying
the pregnancy to term, of the embryos implanting, a reduced risk of
conceiving a Down syndrome or several other syndrome babies, and you may
not need afterwards to pay for prenatal diagnosis. |
|
||||||||||